Thursday, September 22, 2016

CASE DIGEST: Leonardo Paat vs CA G.R. no. 111107 (266 SCRA 167)

Concept:   Doctrine of Prior Resort


Facts:
·      May19, 1989. The truck of Victoria de Guzman was seized by the DENR because the driver of the truck was not able to produce the required documents for the forest products.
·      Jovitio Layugan, the Community Environment and Natural Resources Officer (CENRO), issued an order of confiscation of the truck and gave the owner 15 days to submit an explanation. Owner was not able to sumbit an explanation and the order of the CENRO was enforced.
·      The issue was brought to the secretary of the DENR. While pending, the owner filed a suit for replevin against the Layugan. Layugan filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the owner failed to exhaust administrative remedies. Trial court ruled in favor of the owner. CA sustained Trial Court’s decision

Issue: W/ON the trial court has jurisdiction?

Held. No. This Court in a long line of cases has consistently held that before a party is allowed to seek the intervention of the court, it is a pre-condition that he should have availed of all the means of administrative processes afforded him. Hence, if a remedy within the administrative machinery can still be resorted to by giving the administrative officer concerned every opportunity to decide on a matter that comes within his jurisdiction then such remedy should be exhausted first before courts judicial power can be sought. The premature invocation of courts intervention is fatal to ones cause of action.



 Source and Full Text: http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/jan1997/111107.htm

No comments:

Post a Comment

Manila Electric Company vs. The City of Assessor and City Treasurer of Lucena City, GR No. 166102 dated August 5, 2015 (Protest)

  Facts: ·          MERALCO is a private corporation organized and existing under Philippine laws to operate as a public utility engaged i...